InfoCons Consumers Protection Informs You : Key Trends in the 2025 Counterfeit and Piracy Watch List
Intellectual property rights (IPR) form the bedrock of innovation, creativity, and fair competition in the global economy. When these rights are undermined through counterfeiting and piracy, the consequences ripple far beyond the direct financial losses to rights holders. Public health, consumer trust, and market integrity are all at stake. In recent years, particularly within the European Union (EU), the prevalence of IPR infringements on a commercial scale has reached troubling levels. Counterfeit goods, ranging from luxury items to life-saving pharmaceuticals, continue to enter the EU in vast quantities. Parallelly, digital piracy—particularly of music, films, TV broadcasts, and software—remains a persistent threat, adapting to new technologies and eluding enforcement efforts.
In response to these challenges, the European Commission regularly publishes a Counterfeit and Piracy Watch List, which identifies marketplaces and service providers outside the EU that are allegedly involved in or facilitate IPR infringements. The 2025 edition reflects the evolving landscape of piracy and counterfeiting, drawing on public consultations, industry reports, and enforcement data. Rather than offering legal conclusions, the Watch List aims to encourage action by stakeholders and raise consumer awareness about the risks associated with certain platforms and services.
Read also : InfoCons Consumers Protection Informs you about the EUIPO Online Course on Intellectual Property Essentials
Online Service Providers Facilitating Access to Copyright-Protected Content – InfoCons Consumer Protection informs you !
Digital platforms remain at the heart of modern copyright infringement. These platforms—often hosted outside the EU—allow unauthorized access to protected content, including movies, music, books, and software. Some do so directly, by hosting the content themselves. Others act indirectly by linking to pirated materials, supporting their distribution through services like hosting, advertising, or payment processing.
Streaming has become the dominant method for consuming pirated content, with unlicensed IPTV (Internet Protocol Television) services leading the trend. These services mimic legitimate subscription-based platforms but operate illegally, often with elaborate networks involving intermediaries, resellers, and anonymous hosting providers. The structure is intentionally opaque, designed to hinder enforcement and takedown efforts. Many IPTV apps are pre-installed on consumer devices or made available via unofficial app stores, enabling consumers—often unknowingly—to access pirated content.
Stream-ripping tools further exacerbate the issue. These services convert online streams (usually from legal platforms like YouTube or Spotify) into downloadable files, bypassing copyright protections. Despite enforcement actions, new domains continuously emerge to replace blocked ones. The music industry, in particular, regards stream-ripping as a critical threat, accounting for hundreds of millions of unauthorized downloads annually.
Beyond traditional piracy, newer threats include apps that disguise illegal functionalities, blockchain-based decentralized networks like the Interplanetary File System (IPFS), and even AI tools that clone artists’ voices or generate content from pirated datasets. These technologies are reshaping the digital piracy ecosystem, demanding equally sophisticated responses.
Read also : The InfoCons Consumers Protection App for all OECD Member Countries
E-Commerce and Social Media: Conduits for Counterfeit Trade – InfoCons Consumers Protection informs you !
As commerce shifts online, so too does the trade in counterfeit goods. E-commerce platforms and social media sites have become prominent channels for distributing fake products—ranging from luxury accessories and clothing to pharmaceuticals and automotive parts. Some sellers use misleading branding to appear legitimate, while others exploit loopholes in platform enforcement mechanisms.
Counterfeiting on e-commerce platforms often involves sophisticated tactics, including the use of multiple vendor accounts, encrypted messaging, and drop-shipping. Sellers of counterfeit goods can disappear and reappear under new identities, complicating enforcement. Platforms vary widely in their approach to monitoring and removing such listings. While some are taking active measures—such as improving detection tools and enhancing seller verification—others remain inconsistent in applying industry standards or following up on infringement notices.
Social media platforms are increasingly being used not just for marketing counterfeit goods but also for completing transactions. Closed groups, stories, and direct messages serve as tools for both advertising and distributing fakes, especially on image-based or ephemeral-content platforms. In some cases, counterfeiters integrate with payment apps and logistics services to create seamless, albeit illicit, buying experiences. Messaging apps also play a growing role, offering one-on-one communication between sellers and buyers, often circumventing detection altogether.
Moreover, some platforms with built-in e-commerce features lack robust monitoring, allowing for repeat violations. These digital spaces not only facilitate IPR infringements but also pose risks to consumers by exposing them to potentially unsafe or fraudulent products.
Read also : InfoCons Consumer Protection and the National Cyber Security Directorate Announce a Strategic Partnership in the Field of Cybersecurity
The Continued Threat of Physical Marketplaces – InfoCons Consumer Protection informs you !
While digital piracy garners much of the attention, traditional physical marketplaces continue to be significant sources of counterfeit goods. These markets often operate in regions where enforcement is weak or inconsistent and are commonly frequented by both locals and tourists. Some stalls sell blatant replicas, while others offer more sophisticated counterfeits that closely mimic the appearance and packaging of genuine products.
Products sold at these locations frequently include clothing, footwear, perfumes, cosmetics, watches, toys, and electronics. Beyond commercial losses, the sale of fake pharmaceuticals and automotive parts in physical marketplaces poses direct threats to consumer health and safety. In many instances, counterfeiters use physical marketplaces as testing grounds before scaling their operations online.
Efforts to combat counterfeiting in these settings often depend on local authorities’ cooperation. Some progress has been made—such as increased raids, seizures, and vendor prosecutions—but in many places, counterfeit trade remains entrenched due to corruption, inadequate resources, or lack of political will. To effectively dismantle these networks, enforcement must go beyond isolated crackdowns and involve long-term strategies that address the root causes of IPR violations.
Read also : Attention to Alerts Regarding Motorcycle-Type Vehicles ! Check with Confidence in the European InfoCons App before Purchasing !
A Multi-Faceted Response to a Complex Challenge – InfoCons Consumers Protection informs you !
The complexity and scope of IPR infringement today underscore the need for a coordinated international response. Counterfeiting and piracy are not isolated acts—they are often part of transnational networks that overlap with other forms of organized crime. This reality demands collaboration across borders, sectors, and enforcement bodies.
Platforms must strengthen their content moderation systems, introduce proactive monitoring tools, and improve their cooperation with rights holders and law enforcement agencies. Governments, for their part, must enforce existing laws, close legal loopholes, and provide support for cross-border enforcement initiatives. Meanwhile, consumers must remain vigilant and informed, understanding that seemingly small choices—such as buying from an unauthorized seller or using a pirated app—can fuel broader criminal networks.
Technology, while a vector for IPR abuse, can also be part of the solution. AI and machine learning tools can help detect infringing content, trace counterfeit supply chains, and automate takedown processes. Blockchain technologies offer potential for verifying product authenticity. However, these tools require investment and collaborative governance to be effective.
Lastly, raising public awareness remains essential. Many consumers are unaware of the dangers posed by counterfeit products and pirated content—not just to rights holders but to themselves. From exposure to malware in pirated apps to the risk of harm from fake medicines, the consequences can be severe. Empowering consumers with accurate information is a key pillar in the fight against IPR infringement.
The challenges posed by counterfeiting and piracy in 2025 are greater than ever before. As the world becomes more interconnected, and as digital tools evolve rapidly, so too do the methods employed by infringers. From illegal IPTV services and stream-ripping sites to counterfeit goods promoted on social media and sold in traditional markets, the threat to intellectual property is both vast and dynamic.
However, there is also momentum. Stakeholders across the public and private sectors are recognizing the need for joint action. Through tools like the Counterfeit and Piracy Watch List, the European Union is not only documenting the problem but also calling for concrete solutions. The ultimate goal is to ensure that innovation, safety, and fair competition remain cornerstones of the global economy.
To consult the 2025 Counterfeit and Piracy Watch List, click HERE .
InfoCons – European Organization for Consumer Protection and Promotion of Programs and Strategies , a full member of the World Organization Consumers International , founding member of the Federation of Consumer Associations , and member of ANEC , Consumer Protection , Consumers Protection , Intellectual Property , Be an Example , Sustainable Development , Smart Deal , Green Deal , Alert , Alerts , Consumer Hotline , Sustainability , Environmental Protection , Choose Wisely, Read the Label , Take Action , Health , Trust, Sorin Mierlea , Cybersecurity , Intellectual Property , European Commission , EUIPO , Online Marketplace , E-commerce , Copyright